Print
February 12, 2015
Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center Associate Director Alina Polyakova writes for US News on the ceasefire agreement brokered today in Minsk and how the threat of weapons forced a political solution in Ukraine:


Today in Minsk, European leaders brokered a new ceasefire agreement between Ukraine and Russia as fighting between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian forces intensified since January. The agreement comes on the heels of a policy debate last week of how the U.S. and NATO should act on the Ukraine crisis. The debate, prompted by a report calling on the U.S. government to provide $3 billion dollars in lethal and nonlethal aid to the Ukrainian government, quickly boiled down to one simplistic question: to arm or not to arm Ukraine?

The so-called hardliners on the “pro-arms” side see military assistance as a necessary short-term tool in a broader, long-term strategy to deter Russian intervention in Ukraine and beyond. The self-proclaimed “cooler heads” on the “anti-arms” side see escalation and nuclear threat as inevitable.