July 16, 2014
Don’t Forget the Civilians in the Fight Against ISIS
By Sahr Muhammedally
The fighting has already displaced more than a million people. Over 2,400 have been killed in the month of June, though the United Nations notes the figure represents a minimum, as it does not include casualties in Anbar province. Armed violence caused over 7,800 civilian casualties in 2013, the highest death toll in years, according to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq (UNAMI). Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s sectarian driven policies, excessive use of security forces against critics, weak state institutions has done little to hold the country together since US military forces left Iraq in December 2011 and in fact contributed to the crisis. Sunni Arabs demonstrated against discriminatory practices against their community Sunni Arab localities across Iraq for over a year starting in 2012, which the government ignored politically, but to which it responded with military force, ignoring abuses committed by its security forces.
ISIS, with its own agenda to establish a caliphate across Iraq and Syria, attacked Iraqi government institutions and took advantage of Sunni discontent and lack of national unity. During clashes between protestors and Iraqi forces in Fallujah in December 2013, ISIS saw an opening to fight Iraqi forces. Baathist groups and local residents—who see the Iraqi army as an instrument of sectarian discriminatory policies—supported the militants, allowing them to fight the army, establish a base of operations in Fallujah, and pave the way for an ISIS takeover of Mosul and other Iraqi cities in June 2014.
Last month, President Obama pledged to help the central government by sending up to 300 military advisors and surveillance drones—security assistance that should be matched by a credible commitment by the Iraqi government to fight ISIS in adherence to the laws of war and with tactics that minimize civilian harm or risk losing US support.
The United States learned hard lessons about civilian protection over the course of the last thirteen years in both Afghanistan and Iraq, which can be passed on to its Iraqi counterparts. US military advisors deployed to Iraq stand a better chance at stabilizing the country if they take these lessons to heart. Helping Iraqi security forces create practical guidance for minimizing harm to civilians—which when eventually operationalized in Iraq and Afghanistan did reduce civilian harm—will greatly increase the likelihood of a durable peace in a deeply divided society.
The Iraqi government and military can take clear steps toward civilian protection with assistance from US military advisors:
- The Iraqi military should issue clear policy guidance and orders that emphasize the responsibility of security forces to prevent civilian harm. Such action will remove any ambiguity and potentially create opportunities that promote civilian cooperation against the militants.
- Brigade-level civilian casualty and harm-mitigation tactics will ensure a practical understanding for soldiers on how to avoid placing civilians in risky situations and to address the needs of civilians harmed during military operations. US advisors can give guidance on appropriate distinction between civilians and combatants—a particularly challenging task against an asymmetrical threat where ISIS fighters might not be wearing uniforms, but a useful distinction in the heat of battle to ensure civilians are not unintentionally harmed. Additional tools such as tactical patience—waiting to mount an attack if the threat is not imminent—and consideration of alternatives before using lethal force can also minimize civilian casualties. The Iraqi military, with US assistance can also set up a fully functioning civilian harm tracking, analysis, and response unit to assess the impact of Iraqi forces on the civilian population, to analyze causes of harm and inform tactical changes, and to investigate and respond to incidents wherein civilians suffer bodily harm.
- The Iraqi leadership should take serious action to hold accountable government-backed Shia militias and soldiers who commit gross violations of human rights. While often a difficult proposition amid an ongoing conflict, the strategic benefits far outweigh the potential political fallout within the Shia coalition.
- Lastly, the Iraqi government should develop a clear strategy for the creation of a durable and inclusive peace. The recent election of a parliamentary speaker provides hope that Iraqis can reach a political solution, but the process could use a higher degree of transparency and politics that place civilian protection and access to government at its center.
The United States cannot bankroll a never-ending conflict to prop-up a government that fails in its most basic responsibility to protect its citizens. By the same token, Sunni armed opposition groups must respect civilian life as well. Many of those fighting along with ISIS are reportedly former members of the so-called Awakening—the Sunni tribal ad hoc armed forces organized by US military commanders to fight al-Qaeda in 2007.
For Iraq’s government, success requires long overdue political reforms and rapid moves toward making the government genuinely inclusive. But it must also undertake large-scale transformation of its security sector, beginning with a commitment to civilian protection and harm mitigation tactics in the current fight. Sunni Baathist groups who have allied with ISIS in a Faustian bargain must disassociate with ISIS’s brutal tactics or risk losing support of Sunnis on whose behalf they claim to be fighting, and the opportunity to become responsible members of a future Iraq.
Sunnis fear the Iraqi army and its militias, loathe the government’s sectarian agenda, and now face the brutal presence of ISIS. For civilians, there is no place to hide. Should the Iraqi government offer only a military response that disregards civilian protection, it will not only lose political support at home, but the military and financial support from abroad as well.
Sahr Muhammedally is the Senior Legal Advisor with the Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC)