As Russian President Vladimir Putin grows increasingly isolated domestically and internationally amid the ongoing invasion of Ukraine, there is renewed speculation over who might one day succeed him and what that this would mean for Russia. “For the first time since the conflict began, Russians are starting to imagine a future without Putin,” Britain’s Economist reported in May.
The prospect of new Russian leadership provokes mixed reactions. While few serious commentators would deny that Putin is a dangerous tyrant, many still caution that his replacement could be even worse.
This “better the devil you know” argument rests on the idea that a post-Putin Russia could become less predictable and might be more likely to escalate against the West. However, past experience and current practicalities suggest that the next Russian ruler may be forced to seek a less hostile path.
Stay updated
As the world watches the Russian invasion of Ukraine unfold, UkraineAlert delivers the best Atlantic Council expert insight and analysis on Ukraine twice a week directly to your inbox.
When Soviet leader Josef Stalin died in 1953, many feared he would be succeeded by his notorious secret police chief Lavrentiy Beria, who had been instrumental in many of the Stalin regime’s gravest crimes. Instead, Beria was outmaneuvered by a coalition of senior Soviet figures, with Nikita Khrushchev eventually taking the top spot. While the USSR remained a totalitarian dictatorship until it collapsed almost four decades later, no subsequent Soviet leader instigated a reign of terror comparable to the horrors of the Stalin era.
The highly personalized nature of the Putin regime gives good reason to question assumptions that any future Russian ruler will enjoy similar levels of dominance. Putin has been in power since his appointment as Acting President by the ailing Boris Yeltsin at the turn of the millennium. Over the past quarter of a century, he has managed to consolidate his grip on Russia to a remarkable degree, steadily gaining control over the Kremlin itself, the security services, regional government, the media, and the country’s oligarch class. This system may not outlive Putin.
While it might seem somewhat premature to speculate over potential post-Putin outcomes, the septuagenarian Kremlin dictator is already five years older than the average life expectancy for a Russian male. While he has reportedly invested huge sums in a quest for longevity, nobody lives forever. When the Putin era ends, there is no guarantee that his successor will inherit the rigid power vertical constructed since 2000.
Power in post-Putin Russia is more likely to be divided among several individuals, just as it was after Stalin’s death. The absence of a single dominant figure will create the conditions for internal competition among rival clans and institutions such as the military and Russia’s numerous security agencies. Meanwhile, regional chieftains including Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov will almost certainly seek to exploit any weakening of central power in Moscow to enhance their own authority.
Eurasia Center events
While it is impossible to anticipate how Russia’s post-Putin intrigues and power struggles may eventually play out, it will almost certainly take some time before any single individual can outmaneuver their opponents and establish complete control. This erosion of Kremlin authority would translate into a more divided and weaker country, with implications for both domestic and foreign policy.
An internally weakened Russia would have less resources and political will to continue the invasion of Ukraine or threaten the country’s other neighbors. This would give Europe valuable breathing space to rearm and strengthen its own defensive posture. Russia’s hybrid warfare activities throughout the Western world would also decline.
For those who fear the prospect of a post-Putin Russia, the key concern is often the threat of a possible nuclear escalation. They argue that if Russia is internally weakened or experiences a new collapse echoing the breakup of the USSR, the chances of nuclear weapons being used will increase dramatically.
These concerns are not new and were widespread in 1991. They proved unfounded during the fall of the Soviet Union and remain unconvincing today. With all his personal authority, Putin has not been bold enough to deploy Russia’s nuclear arsenal. Any successor who threatened to go nuclear would lack the governmental unity and domestic support to seriously pursue such a course.
No one can predict the future with precision, but the prospect of a post-Putin Russia should be greeted with cautious optimism. Whoever follows Putin will lack his personal authority while facing significant internal challenges. Russia will in all likelihood remain a highly centralized and deeply authoritarian state, but its ability to engage in acts of aggression will be temporarily reduced. This would be good news for Ukraine, Europe, and international security as a whole.
Brian Mefford is a senior nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council who has lived and worked in Ukraine since 1999. He is the founder and director of Wooden Horse Strategies LLC, a governmental relations and public affairs company based in Kyiv.
Further reading
The views expressed in UkraineAlert are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Atlantic Council, its staff, or its supporters.
The Eurasia Center’s mission is to enhance transatlantic cooperation in promoting stability, democratic values, and prosperity in Eurasia, from Eastern Europe and Turkey in the West to the Caucasus, Russia, and Central Asia in the East.
Follow us on social media
and support our work
Image: The leadership of the Russian Defense Ministry, including Defense Minister Andrei Belousov and Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov, wait before a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia August 5, 2026. (Sputnik/Alexander Kazakov/Pool via REUTERS)