Pakistan South Asia

Report

October 26, 2026 • 4:06pm ET

Pakistan’s changing development assistance landscape: Manifestations, implications, and opportunities

By Leon S. Waskin and Imran Shauket

Pakistan’s changing development assistance landscape: Manifestations, implications, and opportunities

Pakistan’s development assistance landscape is undergoing a major structural shift. Western bilateral aid is declining, multilateral development bank (MDB) financing is increasing to compensate, and non-Western bilateral and philanthropic flows are growing steadily. The model is thus shifting decisively from grant-based Western aid toward loan-based multilateral, and non-Western financing. Pakistan should treat this not as a crisis but as an opportunity to restructure how it receives and governs development assistance.

Total development financing could reach $17.2 billion by 2027, but a compositional challenge remains: the concessional-loan pool does not reach the “soft,” non-revenue sectors—girls’ education, maternal and child health, humanitarian support—in which needs are most acute.

This new normal should prompt Pakistan to adapt a series of key policy steps. First, it should designate or create a central donor coordination entity to map the donor landscape, including donor contributions against Pakistan’s sectoral priorities. Second, as official development assistance is increasingly shifting to loans rather than bilateral grant funding, Pakistan cannot increasingly burden itself in debt without generating income and increasing its foreign currency inflow. Hence, Pakistan needs to identify and invest in sectors with a higher rate of return. Infrastructure alone does not create property; rather, productive, health, and skilled people transform infrastructure into economic output.

Pakistan should also convene conference of potential funding sources—traditional donors and UN agencies alongside Western foundations, Islamic foundations, and corporate social responsibility (CSR)-providing corporations. Its objectives should be to assess each donor’s contribution to Pakistan’s long-term goals, flag underfunded “soft” sectors such as girls’ education and material health, eliminate duplication, and ensure the overall portfolio reflects Pakistan’s priorities rather than those of donors.

Ultimately, Pakistan does not lack for funding. Its 2026-27 trajectory will be defined not by the volume of assistance available but by how efficiently it manages—on its own terms—a multichannel portfolio balancing hard-infrastructure loans with domestic-led social grants.

About the authors

Leon “Skip” Waskin is a nonresident senior fellow focused on South Asia at the Atlantic Council. He previously was DevTech’s senior executive director for operations. Before DevTech, Skip was the coordinator for economic and development assistance at the US Embassy in Islamabad, where he worked to ensure that assistance from the United States supported US national interests and contributed effectively to Pakistan’s long-term stability, prosperity, and growth.

Imran Shauket is a senior adviser on South Asia at the Atlantic Council’s Middle East Programs. He is also a consultant advisor to the Gates Foundation and founder of JOBS Group, an association of myriad entities sharing the common goal of economic empowerment and poverty alleviation.

related reading

Explore the program

Through our Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East, the Atlantic Council works with allies and partners in Europe and the wider Middle East to protect US interests, build peace and security, and unlock the human potential of the region.

Image: A car driving in Pakistan. Jalal Ajmal via Unsplash