May 31, 2016
Europe Still in Denial as Russia Ushers in the Age of Hybrid Hostilities
By Peter Dickinson
When viewed from a safe distance, history tends to look neat and tidy. It appears to us as a succession of clearly defined eras and exact dates. Up close, things are usually far more muddled. Not everyone realized it at the time, but it is now obvious the Russian invasion of Crimea in February 2014 marked the end of the post-Cold War era. By marching into another country and seizing its territory, Russian President Vladimir Putin was effectively tearing down the entire security architecture of modern Europe. In retrospect, this was the appropriate moment for an overwhelming international response. Instead, EU leaders expressed their customary “grave concern” but essentially did nothing. Unsurprisingly, this only served to encourage the Kremlin. With the ink on the Crimean annexation documents still wet, Putin inaugurated the far more ambitious Novorossiya project and sent his “little green men” into eastern Ukraine. The Age of Hybrid Hostilities was well underway. Brussels called for dialogue.
It took the deaths of nearly three hundred passengers and crew on board flight MH17 to awaken the EU from its slumber, but even the sanctions imposed in the wake of the July 2014 airline attack failed to force a radical rethink in Russian strategy. The Kremlin’s military plans in Ukraine ultimately ran aground thanks to stronger than expected Ukrainian military resistance and weaker than anticipated local support for Putin’s vision of a wider Russian World. Nevertheless, the hybrid war continues.
Ukraine remains the main theatre of operations, but it is only one of many active fronts. The Kremlin is currently waging hybrid war across the whole of Europe, weaponizing everything from the Syrian refugee crisis to Russia’s own multi-million strong immigrant diaspora. Far-right EU political parties are bolstered by Russian financing, while disinformation tactics first honed in Ukraine are deployed in Berlin and Paris. Russian jets routinely buzz NATO airspace as the Kremlin engages in nuclear bluster and conducts cross-border abductions in the Baltic states.
The EU response to this mounting aggression has been a baffling mix of collective resolution and individual accommodation. While official EU statements speak of the need to maintain sanctions until Russia withdraws from Ukraine, this has not stopped France from welcoming sanctioned Russian government ministers. Meanwhile, Germany champions increased dependency on Russian energy supplies, Spain services Russian warships, and Greece acclaims Putin himself with undisguised imperial pomp. Faced with this array of enthusiastic appeasers and apologetic opponents, you can hardly blame the Kremlin for regarding Europe’s united front as a temporary aberration, or for assuming it is only a matter of time before the tide turns in Moscow’s favor.
We find ourselves at a critical crossroads in the European story. The handling of the sanctions issue in the coming weeks will provide an indication of Europe’s readiness to acknowledge the changing security environment created by Russian aggression. Even if the existing sanctions remain in place, the discussion over their extension will shed new light on perceptions of the Russian threat in the various European capitals. The Kremlin will interpret any attempt at compromise as a sign of weakness, paving the way for further hybrid hostilities. Russia’s hybrid war tactics are rooted in the assumption that modern Europeans have no stomach for geopolitical confrontation and will always back down when faced with the prospect of having to pay a price for their principles. Ukrainians are already paying this price on a daily basis. Unless the rest of Europe is prepared to foot at least part of the bill, the outcome may well prove disastrous for the entire continent.
Peter Dickinson is the publisher of Business Ukraine magazine and Lviv Today, and editor-at-large at The Odessa Review. He was previously chief editor of Ukraine Today and What’s On Kyiv.