It’s time to admit that the European Union’s (EU) energy security system has failed. Since Russia’s brazen invasion of Ukraine, member states have paid around one billion dollars per day for Russian energy—effectively financing the killing of Ukrainians and possibly fueling a wider war in Europe.
Weaning the continent off Russian gas and oil is perfectly doable. The European Commission has already said the bloc can replace one hundred billion cubic meters of Russian gas by the end of the year—nearly 70 percent of all its imports come from Russia—and, according to Greenpeace, could theoretically cut Russian oil imports by 28 percent immediately if it takes the right measures.
But as the head of Ukraine’s largest private energy provider, I’ve seen how Ukraine itself can play a vital role in a new European energy security system.
After Norway, it has the largest gas deposits in Europe and was producing almost twenty billion cubic meters of gas a year before the war. That figure is expected to grow by one-third within the next three years, according to estimates from my company, DTEK. The EU could also make use of Ukraine’s underground natural-gas storage facilities for its plans to form a strategic gas reserve (which would also allow it to join the EU’s common gas market and increase its own energy security).
Ukraine has much to offer in terms of electricity, too. After being connected to the European energy grid in March—a task long in the making, but which accelerated amid the war—the country is already in the position to export up to 1.5 gigawatts of electricity to the EU. We estimate that amount could increase to 3-4 gigawatts within a year if the grid’s power stability is properly ensured. Energy storage systems, which my company has explored, could play a vital role in this area.
Also important for Europe’s clean-energy revolution: Around 55 percent of Ukraine’s electricity is produced by nuclear power plants, while the country generates around 12 percent from renewable energy such as solar and wind farms. Industry insiders say Ukraine’s vast, windswept terrain is a strong asset for wind energy.
But the full integration of my country into Europe will require something of a “Ukrainian Marshall Plan” aimed at rebuilding Ukraine with an eye toward long-term economic stability—and energy should be one of its priorities. This will be beneficial not only for Ukraine, but for all of Europe.
Here are four key points such a plan must tackle to help boost Ukraine’s already promising energy sector:
- The first phase should begin immediately and include preparations for reconstruction as soon as hostilities end. The original Marshall Plan for post-war Europe was announced only in 1947 and launched a year later—three full years after peace was won on the continent. Neither Europe nor Ukraine can afford to wait that long to start establishing energy security.
- Implementation would also require robust institutional and human capacity. That means overseeing the stable and reliable handling of recovery funds, as well as assisting in the successful conclusion of anti-corruption reform in Ukraine (which would boost transparency and maximize efficiency). I believe this is a crucial point for a trustworthy relationship between the EU and Ukraine.
- The private sector will play a vital role in reconstruction, so creating transparent market conditions by continuing the liberalization of the energy market will be the key to attracting investment in the energy sector. Today, the private sector has turned into the driver of change and development, and a business environment based solidly on market economy principles is the foundation for rapid recovery and forward-thinking innovation in Ukraine.
- Reinvent, not restore: Renewables, hydrogen technologies, small modular reactors, smart grids, and other innovative projects will be able to replace and strengthen the energy sector of Ukraine and, consequently, the EU. The plan should become a roadmap for implementing new technologies—perhaps even some experimental ones—and creating new business models based on those. There is no need to rebuild what has been destroyed; we may be able to build the future of our dreams.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is using energy as a weapon to blackmail much of the world. Cutting off his primary source of finance—and instead buying energy from Ukraine—will not only hamstring the Russian military, but also help rebuild a peaceful country that would embrace European values and contribute to Europe’s long-term energy security.
Maxim Timchenko is the chief executive officer of DTEK, Ukraine’s largest electricity producer. DTEK’s parent company, System Capital Management, is an Atlantic Council donor.
Thu, Jan 13, 2022
Treat the Mediterranean like the center of the world again. Europe’s climate security depends on it.
New Atlanticist By Katerina Sokou
Tackling climate change in the vulnerable coastal ecosystem requires a truly regional approach.
Fri, Apr 22, 2022
How Putin made the case for the G7’s clean green plan
New Atlanticist By
To counter China and decarbonize the Global South, the West must drive its plan forward with ambition.
Fri, Apr 8, 2022
Heat pumps and tipping points: Weaning the world off Russian energy
New Atlanticist By
The transatlantic community should seize on this historic opportunity for a definitive shift to a safer, more secure energy future.