January 4, 2018
Rivalry Between al-Jabha al-Shamiya and Sultan Murad
By Mohammad Dirania
Al-Jabha al-Shamiya benefitted from the revenues it generated while it was in control of the border checkpoint. The group had previously set up a checkpoint in the town of al-Hamran, next to the Syrian Democratic Forces controlled city of Manbij, in order to clamp down on flourishing smuggling networks in the area. The checkpoint also served to facilitate the movement of goods to and from Manbij, as well as preventing the town from turning into a smugglers’ stronghold that could be become a threat. Al-Jabha al-Shamiya and the Sultan Murad Brigade shared revenue generated from the checkpoint.
On September 18, 2017, the interim government and the Syrian Islamic Council called upon armed factions in various parts of the liberated areas to unify as a single National Army under the umbrella of the defense ministry and chiefs of staff set up by the interim government. Several factions in the northern countryside responded, including al-Jabha al-Shamiya and the Sultan Murad Brigade. The former handed over management of the Bab al-Salama border checkpoint to the interim government’s ministry of the interior for migration and passports.
The Sultan Murad Brigade’ commander Ahmed al-Uthman told Enab Baladi that armed factions in the northern Aleppo countryside are working to establish a unified army commanded by the chiefs of staff. A unified army would be able to run all the checkpoints through a single administration. His statement was in the context of the brigade’s response to the interim government's call to establish a unified army, but he made it clear that he disagreed with the administration over who should be in charge with administering the checkpoint. The commander may have suggested that armed groups should run the checkpoints.
With his military background, al-Uthman believes military or armed groups should control major resources. Al-Uthman claimed his brigade had more goodwill with Turkey than both the interim government and al-Jabha al-Shamiya, despite differences over structure and roles. This statement fits with Turkish policy in the northern Aleppo countryside, where Ankara prefers to work with groups that implement what it decides, rather than being rivals or obstacles to its aims.
It will be hard to come to such an arrangement with the transitional government, which has some of the characteristics and structures of a state, or with al-Jabha al-Shamiya, a veteran rebel group with its own vision of how things should be administered. This is in contrast with the Sultan Murad Brigade, which has no specific vision but is made up mostly of Syrian Turkmen, meaning it has close social ties to Turkey and is more likely to be willing to integrate with the Turkish vision for the area than other groups in the area. This pushes it to feel it is the preferred party to take over the checkpoints and facilities, which would bring it into even closer direct contact with the Turkish side.
Al-Uthman’s statement expresses an implicit refusal and generally negative attitude towards handing over the checkpoint to a civilian administration, and a desire to place it under the control of a unified army that will include all factions and channel revenue directly to the army. The interim government is looking to set up offices in the northern countryside, and if it happened could limit the factions’ interference in non-military matters. It could also limit the armed groups ability to exploit resources from the checkpoint.
Initial Outbreak of Fighting
After al-Jabha al-Shamiya handed over control of the checkpoint to the transitional government, it had planned to do the same with the Hamdan checkpoint. A large proportion of the Sultan Murad Brigade revenues is drawn from that checkpoint and threatens their financial interests especially after the failed attempt by the Sultan Murad Brigade to seize and control the al-Ra’i checkpoint. The group later decided to attack al-Jabha al-Shamiya.
The attack started on October 15, 2017 with an assault on al-Jabha al-Shamiya’s base in al-Hamran; along the front lines in Manbij. Sultan Murad Brigade fighters cut the road between Azaz and Jarablus, and extended their assault across several areas of the countryside, where both factions had outposts. Both civilians and fighters, from both sides, were killed and wounded in the fighting. Several Sultan Murad Brigade fighters were also taken captive by al-Jabha al-Shamiya.
The al-Hamza Brigade, part of the Sultan Murad Brigade bloc, also took part in the attack on positions held by al-Jabha al-Shamiya. The latter responded by seizing one of the al-Hamza Brigade’s checkpoints. Similar clashes between Sultan Murad Brigade and al-Jabha al-Shamiya took place at a fuel market in the area.
Leaked voice recordings from Sultan Murad Brigade commanders showed al-Jabha al-Shamiya’s intent to hand over the checkpoint points to the interim government posing a major problem. In one recording, a commander addressed his fighters and said he wanted to obliterate al-Jabha al-Shamiya. He called on Sultan Murad Brigade fighters to kill every last one of its rival’s fighters.
The clashes reached as far as the town of Turkmen Bareh, a Sultan Murad Brigade stronghold. Aleppo Today carried a statement by the head of the Shariah Council of Aleppo, Mohammad Yasser Abu Kesheh, saying that Sultan Murad Brigade fighters had fired on the town’s high school with students inside, and called on both sides to avoid hitting civilians and schools.
Mediation for a Solution, Terms of the Agreement
The defense ministry and the Syrian Islamic Council as well as local council and rebel figures, called on both sides to stop fighting and mediated a truce between them. Both al-Jabha al-Shamiya and Sultan Murad Brigade announced in separate statements that they had accepted the mediators’ calls.
But the Sultan Murad Brigade attack did not end, despite its announcement that it would accept mediation. The fighting continued in several areas and there were renewed calls by public figures, the defense ministry and the Syrian Islamic Council as well as independent rebel activists to end the fighting. The clashes and tensions carried on until October 16, 2017. A deal was reached under the protection of the transitional government the following day, after a meeting attended by both factions, the National Army Contingent (a Turkish training program), the chiefs of staff, rebel figures, and the Syrian Islamic Council. Here are some of the points that were agreed upon:
- Establishing a ceasefire and withdrawing visible weapons.
- Immediate release of prisoners on both sides.
- Handover of administration of any existing and future checkpoints to the transitional government.
- The establishment of a judicial committee to settle any legal issues between the two sides.
- Pledges by both sides to adhere to decisions issued by the defense ministry and the chiefs of staff.
- The interim government’s lack of presence on the ground in opposition held areas, particularly in the northern Aleppo countryside, is an indirect reason for the state of chaos and infighting among rebel forces. The control armed factions exercise over society and the absence of public judicial authorities, as well as the overlap in tasks between civilian and military institutions and their relationship with civilians allows lawlessness to continue.
- The absence of a judicial authority in the northern countryside and the lack of a police force, a legal entity charged with implementing the rulings of the judiciary, gives prominent local figures and independent Syrian personalities a role in mediating conflicts between rebel factions. It also perpetuates the presence of multiple court systems based on areas of influence. This makes the revolution look like a frantic, chaotic movement, damages justice and social security, and harms the interests of civilians. That means that allies of the revolution and influential international players have a responsibility to exert pressure to end the rule of the militias in the opposition held areas in general and the northern countryside in particular.
- Armed factions’ efforts to find new sources of revenue and extend their areas of influence are the biggest factors pushing them towards clashes in the northern countryside. This is in contrast to ideological factors, which are marginal in terms of sparking conflicts. No intra-factional battle has been documented in the northern countryside with ideology as its main driving factor since the end of the Euphrates Shield operation on March 29.
- The depleting sense of initiative on the part of rebel force in general, and particularly in the northern countryside, has prepared the ground for them to be used as tools. States with influence in Syria see them as a means of promoting their own interests or of undermining those of other states, playing on divisions between factions, the obsession with influence and the need for financial resources, which forces factions to review their policies and roles.
- There must be support for the interim government’s moves to take over the border checkpoints in the liberated areas in order to establish the national project represented in the government and its institutions. Limiting security and military operations to the defense and interior ministries in order to end the dominance of armed factions and advance towards creating a model for administration and civilian government in the liberated areas of the north can be used as a valuable negotiating chip in Syria’s transitions after two years of Russian intervention. It can also be used to ensure the implementation of de-escalation deals, as well as in Astana 7 and Riyadh 2.