A cross-party group of 29 Ukrainian MPs has issued the following joint letter raising the alarm over the international security implications of Russia’s unfinished Nord Stream 2 pipeline project:
The Kremlin is on a roll. So far this year, it has used dubious means to entrench its rule, likely poisoned one of its main critics, and now works to suppress protests in Belarus—all while gaslighting the transatlantic intelligentsia regarding the aims of its fledgling economic weapon: the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline.
Russia’s state-owned Gazprom owns 100% of the project. The company has dumped billions of dollars to build these unnecessary pipelines, placing lavish orders with European suppliers. Will Gazprom ever get the money back? The Kremlin couldn’t care less. The project’s role is not commercial but geopolitical: to menace the world. That’s why the Kremlin spends so incessantly on redundant pipelines and fights so fiercely to get them going.
The nearly finished pipeline originates in Russia and runs underwater through the Baltic Sea, with Germany as its planned destination. The Kremlin falsely argues that the pipeline will simply diversify Europe’s natural gas supply routes and deliver new energy to democratic Europe. Nothing more to see here, Moscow claims. It’s just the free market at work.
That argument, of course, is pure propaganda. The Kremlin believes not in the market, but in the exertion of geopolitical power. This informs the true purpose of the pipeline, which is to boost Russian influence in Europe and cripple Ukraine. Currently, Russia relies on Ukraine to sell billions of dollars in natural gas to customers in Europe. The Kremlin despises this dependence because it prevents Moscow from further aggression against our country.
Ukraine’s role in transiting Russian gas to Europe is a deterrent against escalated Russian military adventurism. This is the Kremlin’s central rationale behind Nord Stream 2. The completion of the pipeline would eliminate Ukraine’s key leverage over Russia, leaving our country wholly vulnerable to Russian subjugation. For Ukraine, it’s an almost existential matter of national defense and security.
Subscribe for more from UkraineAlert
UkraineAlert is a comprehensive online publication that provides regular news and analysis on developments in Ukraine’s politics, economy, civil society, and culture.
All is not lost, but it soon could be.
With the Kremlin looking for creative ways to finish the final 160 kilometers of the pipeline, US Congress has included new sanctions in an annual defense bill that will make completing the project impossible. Without such steadfast bipartisan support from Washington, Moscow could very easily have finished the pipeline by now and struck another blow against Ukraine and transatlantic security. What’s more, this Congress push for more sanctions shows America’s sustained and heightened concern for Russia’s unwelcome push into Europe.
It’s worth remembering that these essential sanctions were preceded by years of diplomacy from the Obama and Trump administrations, as well as countless bipartisan warnings from Congress. But those diplomatic efforts were exhausted and unfortunately weren’t enough to halt the project.
While policymakers in Washington have been focused on safeguarding the collective interests of the transatlantic community, a small number of actors in just a handful of European countries have aligned with the Kremlin to build Nord Stream 2. They have failed to consult with their European friends and allies, who are overwhelmingly united against the project. Such earnest consultation would have stopped the pipeline long before construction ever began, removing the need for any US sanctions.
Sadly, this never occurred.
Instead, outright falsehoods are now used to support the completion of Nord Stream 2 and oppose US sanctions. The most obvious falsehood is that Russia is acting in good faith. Proponents of the pipeline say that Russia is working with Germany to ease Ukraine’s inevitable economic pain from this project by committing to ship gas through Ukraine for the next five years. Believing that the Kremlin will honor that commitment requires some imagination and ignores recent history.
In 2019, Moscow did agree to sign a new gas transit contract with Ukraine, but did so only because bipartisan US sanctions against Nord Steam 2 stopped the pipeline in its tracks. Prior to these sanctions, Russia offered Ukraine only a six-month extension of its existing contract, because Moscow assumed the pipeline would be finished within that time frame.
Make no mistake: If Nord Stream 2 is finished, Russia will immediately withdraw from its gas contract with Ukraine. This will leave Ukraine, along with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, at the mercy of the Kremlin and Russian blackmail.
EURASIA CONGRESSIONAL FELLOWSHIP
The Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Congressional Fellowship Program aims to educate Congressional staff on current events in the Eurasia region and engage staff with the Council’s latest research. The program connects Congressional fellows with our larger community, which includes leading experts on Ukraine, Russia, Central Asia, and the South Caucasus.
Applications are open! For questions about the program, please contact Shelby Magid.
Nord Stream 2 proponents expect us to believe that the pipeline is simply another method of energy delivery to Europe. But Nord Stream 2 does not bring any new gas to Europe, it simply redirects existing Russian gas flows away from Ukraine and concentrates them in the Baltic Sea. There is no increased diversification of natural gas or delivery routes, which is the essence of energy security.
Unfortunately for Moscow, its final push to complete the pipeline coincides with a global reckoning that free countries need more supply chain diversification. If Putin’s plan comes to fruition, Nord Stream 2, together with Nord Stream 1, would be the one and only point of arrival for more than 30 percent of Europe’s natural gas, which would undermine Europe’s energy security. This could prove to be a weapon more menacing and more readily employable than Russia’s nuclear stockpile.
During the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, face masks were a nearly impossible commodity to obtain. The fact that a sudden spike in demand temporarily took such a simple yet vital product off the market should force every policymaker to rethink whether it would be a good idea to hand one of the most anti-Western governments in the world the power to decide which Europeans can heat their homes.
A weaker Europe and a stronger Russia benefits no one but the Kremlin, a proven enemy of liberty and democracy. Europeans, Americans, and all who value freedom over coercion should be clear-eyed about Moscow’s intentions. The US must stop Russia’s plans before it is too late.
Nord Stream 2 is a Russian strategic weapon, and it has almost reached its goal. The pipeline has crossed the Baltic Sea, but thanks to US sanctions, construction has paused just a blink of an eye away from reaching Germany. It is time for the democratic world to stop this menace for good.
List of signatories:
Olena Kondratiuk, Rada Member, Batkivschyna, Deputy Speaker of the Parliament of Ukraine
David Arakhamia, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Faction Chair, Majority Leader
Artur Gerasymov, Rada Member, European Solidarity, Faction Co-chair, Deputy Head of OSCEPA Delegation
Iryna Gerashchenko, Rada Member, European Solidarity, Faction Co-chair
Sergii Rakhmanin, Rada Member, Holos, Faction Chair
Mykyta Poturaiev, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Head of the Committee for Humanitarian and Informational Policy, Head of Rada Delegation to the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly
Yehor Cherniev, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Chair of the Ukrainian Delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, Deputy Head of the Digital Transformation Committee
Yelyzaveta Yasko, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Head of the Ukrainian Delegation to PACE, Head of the Subcommittee on Bilateral, Multilateral and Interparliamentary Cooperation
Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze, Rada Member, European Solidarity, Chair of the Committee for Ukraine's Integration into the EU, First Deputy Head of the Parliamentary Association Committee
Mariia Ionova, Rada Member, European Solidarity, Member of the Foreign Affairs Committee
Serhii Nahorniak, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Member of the Energy, Housing and Communal Services Committee
Solomia Bobrovska, Rada Member, Holos, Secretary of the Foreign Affairs and Parliamentary Cooperation Committee
Serhii Soboliev, Rada Member, Batkivschyna, First Deputy Head of the Ukrainian Delegation to PACE
Alona Shkrum, Rada Member, Batkivschyna
Vadym Halaichuk, Rada Member, Servant of the People, First Deputy Head of the Committee on issues of European integration
Galyna Mykhailiuk, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Deputy Head of the Committee on Law Enforcement
Ielizaveta Bogutskaya, Rada Member, Servant of the People
Bohdan Yaremenko, Rada Member, Servant of the People
Dmytro Kysylevskyy, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Deputy Head of the Committee on Economic Development
Yevheniia Kravchuk, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Deputy Head of the Committee on Humanitarian and Information Policy
Rostyslav Pavlenko, Rada Member, European Solidarity
Mykhailo Zabrodskyi, Rada Member, European Solidarity, First Deputy Head of the Committee on National Security, Defence and Intelligence
Sofiya Fedyna, Rada Member, European Solidarity
Maryna Bardina, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Deputy Head of the Committee on Foreign Policy and Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation
Mykhailo Ananchenko, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Head of the Subcommittee of the Committee on Foreign Policy and Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation
Yulia Klymenko, Rada Member, Holos
Volodymyr Ariev, Rada Member, European Solidarity, First Deputy Head of the Committee on Transport and Infrastructure
Anastasia Radina, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Head of the Committee on Anti-Corruption Policy
Marikovsky Oleksandr, Rada Member, Servant of the People, Deputy Head of the Committee on Environmental Policy and Nature Management
UkraineAlert Sep 6, 2020
Has Vladimir Putin poisoned his pet pipeline project?
By Diane Francis
Germany had long resisted US calls to abandon the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project, but the poisoning of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny has now sparked a dramatic shift in German opinion.
UkraineAlert Jul 6, 2020
Czar Putin wants a new age of empires
By Nataliia Popovych and Danylo Lubkivsky
In both word and deed, Putin has made it clear that he rejects today’s rules-based international order and seeks to reverse the verdict of 1991. His vision for a new age of empires represents an existential challenge to the West.
UkraineAlert Dec 19, 2019
Naftogaz CEO Andriy Kobolyev: “The likelihood of Russia helping us is zero”
By Diane Francis
Andriy Kobolyev took over the reins of Ukraine’s energy giant Naftogaz during the country's darkest hour in March 2014. Despite huge progress, he continues to face political opposition at home and an array of international challenges courtesy of the Kremlin.
The views expressed in UkraineAlert are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Atlantic Council, its staff, or its supporters.
The Eurasia Center's mission is to enhance transatlantic cooperation in promoting stability, democratic values and prosperity in Eurasia, from Eastern Europe and Turkey in the West to the Caucasus, Russia and Central Asia in the East.