Toward digital power over states

Security officers keep watch in front of an AI (Artificial Intelligence) sign at the annual Huawei Connect event in Shanghai, China September 18, 2019. REUTERS/Aly Song

Rapid advances in digital technologies amplify the potential for data acquisition from and influence over other states. One state aggressively pursuing digital advantage globally is China, especially in its leveraging of artificial intelligence (AI). This memo presents recent data from multiple sources and initial analysis to set the stage for discussion about the profound implications of imminent digital power by China.

A leading concern for those states not presently engaged in AI and related technologies is that they will fall behind those that are already heavily innovating and investing. In addition to expert programmers, AI requires an entire infrastructure of capabilities like next-generation semiconductors, advanced materials, cloud computing, robotics, and especially science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Without these aspects in place, states may not be able to engage or compete in AI. Governments that can successfully cultivate the necessary culture will be strategically positioned, whereas those without the means or resources to do so may face additional barriers to their competitiveness. Such lack of engagement in AI by numerous states leaves them vulnerable to other states that may not have the best interests of the native state in mind.

Chinese influence

To assess the global reach of China’s data-gather and surveillance capabilities, FutureGrasp leveraged its report, Artificial Intelligence: An Overview of State Initiatives, and data from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Freedom House, and This Week in Asia. The figures below provide a visual portrait of the influence and potential control by China upon states less active in AI today. They show the contrast between those states with and without AI initiatives and those states that have embedded Chinese AI surveillance systems (cameras, facial recognition algorithms, data-mining capabilities, etc.) into their infrastructure. An AI national plan or strategy is defined as in the FutureGrasp report as “an overarching document adopted by a Government with a specific political and legal character that is intended to guide all national efforts in a respective field, and to coordinate and to align the activities of stakeholders.” Interest in an AI national plan or strategy is noted when a state has formed a working group and/or published a white paper or outline toward such a document.

There are currently sixty-four states with active Chinese AI surveillance systems in some capacity within their borders. Of those states, fifty-three have no recognized state-supported AI initiatives. Also notable is the global distribution of Chinese influence via AI surveillance systems; every continent mapped has states using AI surveillance systems from China. This digital, global influence being wielded by China poses a grave challenge to the United States and its allies.

It is imperative that senior policy makers and corporate C-suite recognize and act accordingly to this strong trend toward digital dominance by China. Once Chinese AI surveillance systems are in place, there is good probability of the data acquired being returned to China, as reported in Taiwan News. States will also most probably become more dependent upon China as Chinese systems may control core aspects of security and commerce, as noted in Quartz Africa. Finally, the future ability to remove such systems and replace them with native or Western systems is diminished. The profound implications from this trend toward Chinese digital power will be discussed further in future articles.

Global distribution of Chinese AI surveillance systems relative to states with an AI national plan or interest in an AI national plan. Legend in lower left details the numbers of states represented by each color or crosshatch. As of September 2019, sixty-four states have adopted Chinese AI surveillance systems. Of those states, fifty-three have no AI national initiatives.
Sixty-four states with AI surveillance systems from China. Color codes illustrate which states have AI national plans in place, or those States that have expressed interest in an AI national plan. (*data sources identical to global map above)

Thomas A. Campbell, Ph.D., is president and founder of FutureGrasp, an advisory group established in 2017 to assist organizations around the world in capturing and comprehending emerging and disruptive technologies. Leveraging their deep technical and business expertise, FutureGrasp identifies not only technology trends, but also assesses what those trends mean short- and long-term via rigorous due diligence and data analysis. Working at the intersection of business and policy, FutureGrasp is honored to partner with senior policy makers, corporate C-suite, successful startups, and leading think tanks and universities.

Further reading