“If you compare the debate between Finland and Sweden, Finland is more actively discussing NATO. The [security] situation is closely monitored and decisions are made on the basis of that. In Sweden, we look back and think that the current policy has been stable and has served us well. Finland has a more flexible attitude,” Wieslander told Finland’s STT .
Related Reading
What I heard in Munich: A lot of bold words, but little bold action
As long as there are doubts about who belongs to Europe (and how), that means weakness and vulnerability for all.
Wieslander speaks to Marshall Center on “Sweden and Finland: Responses to the Russian Threat”
By Anna Wieslander
On the occasion of the Alumni in-residence-scholarship of Anna Wieslander, Director Northern Europe at the Atlantic Council, the Marshall Center organized an online seminar to analyze Sweden’s and Finland’s responses to Russia’s threats and aggression. Russia’s military attack on Ukraine on the same day made the seminar particularly relevant and timely.
Wieslander on “Finlandization” of Ukraine in New York Times
By Anna Wieslander
“‘Finlandization’ would appear to rule out [the possibility of NATO membership for Ukraine] and allow Moscow a heavy hand in Ukrainian affairs — concessions Kyiv and NATO have rejected as unacceptable, ” wrote the New York Times. “All of this goes against what Ukraine has been striving for,” said Anna Wieslander, director for Northern Europe […]
Related Experts: Anna Wieslander