January 26, 2021
Christen a carrier strike group: NATO 20/2020 podcast
Using the HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales as its backbone, a NATO carrier strike group is an opportunity for high-end interoperability under European leadership.
About this episode
Long before the coronavirus battered European economies, NATO’s European allies were finding it difficult to produce the cash or the political will to spend 2 percent of their GDP on defense. Now, with the COVID-19 pandemic straining government budgets, defense spending is likely to be on the chopping block. This will have serious implications for transatlantic security. Even as budgets shrink, security challenges will remain. China has shown an increasing willingness to intimidate democracies, while Russia remains a spoiler in Europe and the Middle East.
Financial calamity does not mean that European cooperation within NATO should take a step back. In fact, now is the perfect time for European militaries to work together, and no better opportunity exists than to use the HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales as hubs for a NATO carrier strike group (CSG). A NATO CSG would be a powerful symbol of Alliance unity and would bolster the Alliance’s force posture and interoperability.
Watch the video
- 2:11: Michael talks about why he thinks NATO needs a carrier strike group and the capabilities it would give the Alliance
- 8:42: Michael talks about whether some allies may or may not want NATO to have a CSG
- 11:11: Michael discusses the actual capability of carrier strike groups
- 12:53: Michael explains which NATO countries already have aircraft carriers that NATO could use as part of its CSG
- 18:11: Michael discusses who would have the command and control over any potential NATO CSG
- 22:46: Michael shares his thoughts on whether the call for NATO to have a carrier strike group is largely US-driven
- 24:04: Michael postulates on whether a NATO CSG would require new spending from NATO allies
- 25:50: Michael explains why a NATO CSG would be a useful and flexible tool, not just for the United States or Great Britain, but for all the allies
- 28:54: Michael shares how a NATO carrier strike group could play into the China challenge
- 30:27: Michael assesses the respective Chinese and Russian threats and whether they would require a NATO CSG to respond effectively
Read the essay
Explore the podcast series
Related NATO 20/2020 essays
NATO 20/2020 Oct 14, 2020
Modernize the kit and the message
By H.E. Dame Karen Pierce DCMG
NATO will only remain successful over the next seventy years if it modernizes its capabilities, takes command of emerging technology, and harmonizes its strategic messaging.
NATO 20/2020 Oct 14, 2020
Build an Atlantic-Pacific Partnership
By James Hildebrand, Harry W.S. Lee, Fumika Mizuno, Miyeon Oh, and Monica Michiko Sato
NATO is the only institution capable of organizing transatlantic and transpacific stakeholders to address China’s political, military, and information threats.
The Transatlantic Security Initiative, in the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, shapes and influences the debate on the greatest security challenges facing the North Atlantic Alliance and its key partners.