The European and transatlantic geopolitics of energy have changed dramatically over the last few months. Prior to the invasion of Ukraine, Russia provided the EU with 40 percent of its annual gas demand. Just three months later, the European Commission put forward REPowerEU, a bold plan to reduce its decades-long dependence on the supply of Russian fossil fuels to a minimum.
However, moving away from Russian gas will be particularly difficult and cannot be achieved quickly. While increasing energy efficiency and switching to other suppliers—including the United States—as well as ramping up LNG capacity both at home and in supplier nations are part of the short- to medium-term remedy, hydrogen will be critical to the long-term solution to the challenge.
Thus, it is encouraging that on the same day that the EU launched REPowerEU, Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany signed a declaration to build 65 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind power capacity and 20 GW of hydrogen capacity by 2030. While German industry is poised to be the driver of demand for hydrogen, Denmark and Norway (though the latter is not an EU member) can play a key role in creating a reliable, sustainable, and profitable European hydrogen market. Although the two Nordic countries have a combined population of just 11.3 million people (less than Ohio), they are not only both founding members of NATO, but also hold important pieces to solve the European energy puzzle.
First, Norway is the largest net exporter of electricity in Europe, surpassing even the EU’s largest economies such as Germany and France. However, as hydropower produces 86 percent of Norway’s electricity, any new offshore wind power could be used for hydrogen production. An important factor will be the combination of the fluctuating wind power and the use of Norway’s hydropower as a “battery” that will allow the country to utilize the electricity surplus as a cheap and reliable source of power for electrolysis.
Second, both countries have substantial potential to expand their offshore wind energy capacity. Denmark has pledged to build 35 GW of offshore wind power capacity by 2050 that could power 53.66 million households. However, as Denmark only has 2.8 million households, the expansion of offshore wind power will create a significant surplus of electricity which the country intends to export to its neighbors and use to produce hydrogen. Norway also recently launched a plan to develop 30 GW of offshore wind power by 2040, which calls for an expansion of its grid connections to the UK, Germany and Netherlands.
Third, the Danish government has set a goal of building up to 6 GW of electrolysis capacity by 2030. Norway has yet to set a goal for its hydrogen production capacity, but its government’s hydrogen roadmap, published last year, calls for the construction of two industrial hydrogen plants. More importantly, as the Norway’s sovereign wealth fund boasts $1.2 trillion (more than the total GDP of Mexico or Indonesia), the country could play a significant role in the hydrogen economy by providing risk finance both at home and abroad.
Fourth, despite the hype about “Nordic socialism” in the US, both Denmark and Norway are strong market economies that attract considerable foreign investment. In fact, the World Bank most recent Ease of Doing Business Index ranked them fourth and ninth globally (the US was placed sixth). This bodes well, as almost 7 GW of electrolysis capacity is under planning in Denmark right now.
Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, but it will be no small feat to have it first supplement and, down the road, perhaps even overtake natural gas in Europe as a source of energy. If Germany stays the course and leads the demand-pull for hydrogen, Denmark kickstarts the production of hydrogen, and Norway helps with the financing of risks through partnerships, Europe can lead the global hydrogen revolution. The two Nordic countries’ experience, know-how, wealth, abundant wind resources, and strong commitment to democracy makes them the ideal—if perhaps unexpected—leaders to shrug off the Russian gas yoke.
András Simonyi is a former Hungarian ambassador to the US and NATO now living and working in Washington, DC. He was the managing director of the Center for Transatlantic Relations at SAIS Johns Hopkins University (2012-2018), presently working as a nonresident senior fellow with the Atlantic Council Global Energy Center and at the George Washington University School of Engineering and Applied Science. Follow him on Twitter @AndrasSimonyi
Morten Svendstorp is a strategic advisor to the Danish Minister of Climate, Energy and Utilities. He was a senior advisor on climate, energy and the environment at the Danish Embassy in Washington from 2015-17 and a political advisor to the Danish Social Democratic Party in the Danish Parliament from 2010-15. Follow him on Twitter @Svendstorp
EnergySource May 3, 2022
Gazprom set the Russian invasion of Ukraine in motion
By Alan Riley
Gazprom’s actions in the months leading up to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine can only be interpreted as stage-setting maneuvers to deter European involvement. Its willingness to abdicate its commercial responsibilities raises serious questions about Europe’s future business with Russian energy companies.
EnergySource Apr 29, 2022
Keeping Europe united: A roadmap for avoiding Russia’s trap
By Olga Khakova
Russia’s shutoff of its gas exports to Poland and Bulgaria presents a major test of European unity. But the EU has several options for defending its energy security and lessening the impact of the Russian energy threat.
EnergySource Apr 29, 2022
The ruble gas gamble
By Aliona Osmolovska
Putin’s decree that gas payments from “unfriendly nations” must be made in rubles has the potential to foment division in Europe. Russian gas buyers on the continent should be aware of the dangers of compliance and of their legal recourses in the face of a cessation of supply.
Learn more about the Global Energy Center
The Global Energy Center promotes energy security by working alongside government, industry, civil society, and public stakeholders to devise pragmatic solutions to the geopolitical, sustainability, and economic challenges of the changing global energy landscape.