What is Economic Statecraft?
Economic statecraft is the use of financial, regulatory, and economic tools to achieve foreign policy objectives. In the 21st century, many countries have proven less likely to use military force and instead rely on financial measures such as sanctions to influence other actors’ behavior. This trend deviates from traditional military and diplomatic ways of conducting foreign policy and marks an era where regulation and its implementation take center stage.
Financial and economic measures may seem less costly than military engagement but can still create inefficiencies in the global economy and threaten economic growth. The key challenge is to design effective policies that minimize fallout for ourselves and our partners, and do not invite asymmetric retaliation.
The Economic Statecraft Initiative at the Atlantic Council will address this challenge – by acting as a convener for policymakers and private sector representatives, conducting in-depth research and analysis at the intersection of economics and foreign policy, and leveraging deep industry expertise.
Economic statecraft tools
Our goal is to clarify the role sanctions can (and cannot) play in advancing policy objectives, harness the power of our allies, and promote options that minimize consequences for the private sector. We leverage deep government experience and proprietary data to produce widely-read analysis and expert briefings.
The initiative also explores export controls — tools that are capable of setting back entire nations’ technological advancement, but are often under-analyzed. We examine both unilateral and multilateral applications and their effect on global trade. New export control tools designed for technological competition with China are now being used to thwart technological progress in Russia’s military.
ESI has spearheaded debate in Washington on the design of investment screening and its role in foreign policy. The initiative’s events and flagship publications have informed discussions on a potential outbound investment screening mechanism, which is especially relevant in the context of economic competition between the US and China.
Trade and capital markets
ESI leads the Council’s research on trade and financial market regulation. We study the intersection of finance and national security. Our experts seek effective ways to enhance coordination between the US and its allies on regulation of capital markets and the tracking of illicit finance, while avoiding protectionism.
featured sanctions trackers
Recent Commentary & Analysis
Econographics Nov 8, 2022
What US outbound investment screening means for Transatlantic relations
By Elmar Hellendoorn
Whether the EU follows through with new outbound investment controls and what those might look like will also depend on the evolution of American national security policy and transatlantic diplomacy.
Econographics Oct 12, 2022
Companies on the front line: Trends in overseas Chinese listings
By Maia Nikoladze
Delisting more than 150 Chinese companies is a bigger hit than Chinese private sector can take at this time. However, we don’t yet know whether Beijing will follow through on its side of the audit-sharing deal.
New Atlanticist Oct 27, 2022
US economic tools: The frontline of protecting national security—maybe even from Twitter
By Jonathan Panikoff
Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter shows how the United States views CFIUS, and related government tools, as the new pointy end of the spear when it comes to protecting US national security.
Issue Brief Sep 27, 2022
Will economic statecraft threaten western currency dominance? Sanctions, geopolitics, and the global monetary order
By Dr. Carla Norrlöf
The return of great power rivalry is stoking renewed fears of weakening Western currency dominance. Financial sanctions are becoming the preferred economic tool for accomplishing geopolitical goals.
Issue Brief Sep 14, 2022
Sand in the silicon: Designing an outbound investment controls mechanism
By Sarah Bauerle Danzman and Emily Kilcrease
The stakes for rethinking the investment relationship between the United States and China are high. An outbound investment mechanism must be narrowly targeted, clearly defined, non-duplicative of existing tools, scoped proportionately to administrative capacity, and paired with meaningful multilateral engagement with allies and partners.