Forward Defense‘s “Seizing the Advantage: The Next US National Defense Strategy” explores the future of defense through frank review of current policy, cogent expert analysis of the present security environment, and actionable recommendations for strategy to meet future defense challenges. The project will begin with a series of op-eds and short analytical pieces designed to facilitate debate over the ideal strategic underpinnings, central pillars, and operationalization of future defense strategy, and will culminate in a published Strategy Paper that articulates the Atlantic Council’s key recommendations for the next National Defense Strategy (NDS).
A paradigm adjustment
Read FD Deputy Director Clementine Starling and LtCol Matthew Crouch‘s primary argument for why the next National Defense Strategy needs a paradigm adjustment to revise its central theory of competition. The Department of Defense must adjust its key lines of effort to embody a broader posture for multi-spectrum competition in order to prepare for not only high-end, high-tech, kinetic warfare, but also low-end, hybrid warfare. To seize the advantage, the next NDS must place a greater emphasis on understanding and addressing the escalation ladder between hybrid and kinetic warfare. Starling and Crouch lay out four key recommendations for the next National Defense Strategy.
Op-eds and commentary
FD’s leading-edge op-eds and commentary advance the debate on key defense issues and offer practical policy recommendations for the next National Defense Strategy.
America’s fleeting second-mover advantage is here
By Lt. Col. Matthew R. Crouch
Though Chinese initiative has upset the status quo, their first move clarifies their vulnerabilities and exposes potential effective counterweights. By acting promptly to exploit these opportunities, the United States can take the second-mover advantage.
Reconciling ends and means in US national security
By Christopher Preble
The next National Defense Strategy should recognize that the American people’s unwillingness to spend considerably more money on the military necessitates a serious reconsideration of what is needed to secure the nation’s truly vital interests.
Elevating ‘deterrence by denial’ in US defense strategy
By Erica D. Borghard, Benjamin Jensen, and Mark Montgomery
As the Biden administration reshapes foreign policy and makes decisions about how to invest in US military capabilities for the future, it should acknowledge the value of a denial-based approach to deterrence.
How the next National Defense Strategy can get serious about emerging technologies
By Justin Sherman and Evanna Hu
US adversaries including China, Iran, and Russia are investing in additional technological capabilities to counterbalance the United States’ advantages in great-power competition—specifically its dominance in kinetic operations and weapons. The next NDS must differentiate among different technologies to create more nuanced strategies.
What the US can learn from the UK about strategic reviews
By Peter Watkins, Will Jessett CBE
The Biden administration has begun work on a slew of strategies—including a new National Security Strategy, National Defense Strategy, and Nuclear Posture Review—that will form the framework for its approach to security challenges. There’s a lot that it can learn from the British experience of conducting strategic reviews.
US national defense strategy and the future of foreign military sales
By LTG Charles W. Hooper
Ongoing great-power competition, US efforts to strengthen alliances and partnerships, and the global dominance of the US defense industry will ensure that FMS remains a policy tool of first resort. This being the case, US policymakers need to ensure that it is the most efficient tool that it can be.
Making Space for the Next National Defense Strategy… In Space
By Lt Col Christopher P. Mulder and Julia Siegel
As the Space Force surpasses its first year of existence, the next National Defense Strategy must recognize that space operations are critical to reaching resolutions in the years to come.
Recalculating the math of great-power competition
By Arun Iyer
To better serve US interests, the Biden administration should recalculate the DoD’s GPC framework to address the threats that the country is most likely to confront, while improving the United States’ preparedness for the most dangerous threats. It should replace the single “2+3” concept with three multilayered and interactive frameworks nested upon one another.
How the US and EU can counter digital threats together
By Harry I. Hannah
Russian and Chinese threats all seek to exploit gaps in Western cyber defenses and digital and information governance. To close these gaps as a part of its defense strategy, the United States should develop a strong collaborative relationship with the European Union in the digital and information sphere.
A connected world is a vulnerable world. The US can help secure it.
By Benjamin Jensen
National security is no longer measured by the size of a country’s military forces. It is measured by how efficiently and securely a country, as part of a network of allies and partners, exchanges information, resources, and ideas.
Stay tuned for Q&A articles as distinguished security and defense experts respond to Forward Defense’s most pressing questions about the future of defense strategy and the next National Defense Strategy.
Seizing the advantage Mar 1, 2021
How should the next National Defense Strategy balance terrorism, rogue regimes, and great-power competition?
By Matthew R. Crouch, Ronald C. Fairbanks
Our experts explore how the United States can tackle terrorism, address the advances of rogue regimes, and establish a balance between competition and cooperation with other global powers.
In the News Feb 11, 2021
Starling interviewed by Government Matters on the next National Defense Strategy
By Atlantic Council
Forward Defense Deputy Director Clementine Starling discusses her latest op-ed on how the United States should regain its competitive advantage vis-a-vis great-power rivals in its next National Defense Strategy.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the authors and contributors, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the US government or other organization.
Subscribe for more defense analysis
Sign up for updates from Forward Defense to hear the latest on the trends, technologies, and military challenges shaping tomorrow.
All content on the next National Defense Strategy
Forward Defense, housed within the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, shapes the debate around the greatest military challenges facing the United States and its allies, and creates forward-looking assessments of the trends, technologies, and concepts that will define the future of warfare.